The
song was originally the final act that separated the duo, which would
not be the last time that they would separate The song was then
redone with the addition of some new elements, including new
instruments, done by Tom Wilson. When it was redone, it quickly
climbed to the top of the charts and brought the two back together.
This song was far different from any other protest song which was how
it went above and beyond. It was a huge hit, but the funny thing was
that neither Simon nor Garfunkel knew about the change. It was more
interesting in terms of Paul Simon because he wrote it, and because
he was in England when it became popular, his return to the States
led him to realize something big had happened. “When he returned,
he had discovered that he had become famous” (Piero Scaruffi, Paul
Simon).
So
enough of the background story, now we need to understand WHY it was
so different from the rest of any other protest song out at the time.
How did the improvisions of Tom Wilson make the song a hit? First
off, Tom Wilson made the change in the song to keep it up to date
with the current style of music that was very popular at the time. He
gave the song a taste of folk rock, and that was just what the song
needed. But the main key in this hit protest song was what it was
protesting about. “The Sound of Silence is a protest song
protesting the lack of protest” (The Tooners-Rock and Roll Rehab,
The Sound of Silence as the Sound of Social Protest).
As awkward as that quote sounds it is all too true. It may have
seemed that “some” people were speaking out against the chain of
troubling events, but in fact there was no change from all of this
ranting and protesting. As the decade progressed times got worse in
the boundaries of social conflict. There just were not enough hands
being raised to participate against the hardships that America faced.
This was only intensifying the wound that the country endured. The
wound would not heal unless a united, strong front approached the
injury. This song was far different from the others because it
protests were attacking the people, rather that the government or the
issues the country was facing. The real “enemy” was us all along,
in our lack to unite and protest together. Another major difference
in this song and any other written by this duo, was the tone. Rather
than an angry vibe or a direct assault on the listeners, Simon and
Garfunkel held a tone of a calm call out to the people. The lack of
communication between people was the issue and it was soon realized
and it quickly took hold of the emotions of the young protesters. The
lyrics all simply imply a message of what the American people have
let themselves become and it leaves them with a feeling of guilt. The
song leaves with them with implications of a change in that behavior.
This was a song that had many Americans evaluating their lives and
having them see that the war was not elsewhere[Vietnam], but rather
back at home with each other.
The
capabilities that simple songs can to to the human emotions is
remarkable. In a time of turmoil with many events backing it up,
including the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Paul Simon and Art
Garfunkel made a masterpiece that would forever change the face of
the American people. In an ironic twist, their “protest song” was
all about a lack of protest. Rather than a cry for war, they
portrayed a cry for change in the communication between all
Americans. A song that was understood as a message for reform from
within, will still be remembered as a classic piece of music!
No comments:
Post a Comment